Wednesday, December 13, 2006

current event questions

Sorry about the questions that were posted with my current event. I didn't realize you couldn't read them. Here they are again:

Do you think it' strange that Sean Timoney's father, Chief John Timoney, attended to his son's sentencing, but did not comment?

After his release from prison, Do you think its nessacary for Sean Timoney to be supervised for four years and enter a drug treatment program? Why or why not?

10 comments:

BLG said...

Do you think it' strange that Sean Timoney's father, Chief John Timoney, attended to his son's sentencing, but did not comment?

After his release from prison, Do you think its nessacary for Sean Timoney to be supervised for four years and enter a drug treatment program? Why or why not?

1. I don't really think it is that strange maybe he just forgot or something

2. Yes,because it could help him out with his problems

csw said...

1. I don't really find it strange because it's not something to be really proud of.

2. Yes because he needs to quit and if no one counsels him then he'll just start doing drugs.

grd said...

I don't think that it was strange only because maybe Sean Timoney's father was to ashamed to say anything.

I deffinatly think that it is nessacary for Sean Timoney to be supervised for four years and enter a drug treatment program, so it could pervent him from a having relapse.

A.G.S said...

I think that it is very necessary that he is watched for 4 years. I think he should even be watched longer to ensure he is no trying to buy or sell drugs to anyone.
I think the father did not comment because he was to ashamed and too disappointed.

STS said...

1. I dont think its that weird that Sean did not comment about his son because it would be kind of weird to be in his situation.

2. I think it is nessacary for him to be supervised, because his dad is a cop.

JLB said...

1. I dont find it strange because you shouldnt be happy about something like that

2. I think it is really nessacary that Sean Timoney to be sepervised because he will just start doing drugs again.

K.R. said...

Yes I think its strange that Timoney's father attended the sentencing but didn't comment, but it was probably because he was ashamed and felt gulity for not teaching his son what's right. No i don't think Timoney should be supervised for 4 years because it would interfear with his privacy and personal life.But i do think he should enter a drug treatment program to help him releave the need for taking or buying/selling drugs, if not he will continue taking them without knowing the bad outcomes of it.

t.m said...

I dont think it is strange maybe the father was just so dissapointed and ashamed.
Yes i think he should be watched fore four years because what he did was really bad and he should enter a drug treatment program.

KRP said...

1. No, i don't think it is that strange, because he could of felt embarrass or ashamed of his son.

2. I can't agree more with him having to be supervised becuase he could get more marijuana. Also the drug treatment program can help him with his drug problems.

bca said...

1.no i dont think its that strange that his dad didnt comment because was ashamed or just mad

2.i definely think he nessacary becaouse he obviously has some problems and supervising could defintly help him with that.